How To Buy GitHub Accounts {New & Old} in 2025 — Case Studies of Scams and What They Teach Us

1. Why People Still Try to Buy GitHub Accounts

Before diving into the scams, it’s essential to understand why this trade exists at all — despite clear terms of service prohibiting it.

1.1 The lure of instant reputation

In open-source communities, older accounts often appear more trustworthy. A profile that “joined in 2012” with 300 stars and long commit history looks like a seasoned engineer. For new developers, this can seem like an easy way to “skip the line.”

1.2 Marketing & automation

Some marketing teams and bot developers want many GitHub accounts for mass-hosting repositories, running API experiments, or manipulating stars. Because GitHub monitors suspicious activity, these users try to buy pre-verified accounts that appear legitimate.

•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜⁕

•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜⁕

⁑⁑ If you want to more information just contact now-

⁑⁑ 24 Hours Reply/Contact

⁑⁑ ➤WhatsApp: +1 (707) 338-9711

⁑⁑ ➤Telegram: @Usaallservice

⁑⁑ ➤Skype: Usaallservice

⁑⁑ ➤Email:usaallservice24@gmail.com

•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜⁕

•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜⁕

⁑⁑ https://usaallservice.com/product/buy-github-accounts/

1.3 Business acquisition misconceptions

Some buyers claim they’re “acquiring assets” — as if GitHub accounts were business properties. In reality, GitHub profiles are tied to personal identities and can’t be legally resold without written consent and verified transfer procedures.

1.4 Lack of awareness

Finally, misinformation fuels demand. SEO-optimized “marketplaces” and Telegram channels claim the process is legal and common — when in fact, nearly all listings are fabricated.

2. The Dark Anatomy of GitHub Account Scams

Let’s explore what’s really happening behind those flashy offers.

3. Case Study #1 — The “Aged Developer” Telegram Scam

Background: In early 2025, a small software startup in India wanted an “aged GitHub profile” to boost credibility during client outreach. They found a Telegram seller advertising “2015-2018 GitHub accounts — 100% active, verified, U.S. aged.”

The Deal:

• Price: $90 per account
• Claimed Features: “8 years old, 150+ followers, 25 repos”
• Payment Method: USDT (crypto only)
• “Proof”: Screenshots of GitHub profiles with long histories

What Happened: After payment, the buyer received login credentials. They successfully logged into a GitHub account that looked legitimate — until 24 hours later, the password stopped working. GitHub had flagged the login as unauthorized; the true owner reset their access.

When the buyer contacted the seller, they were blocked immediately.

Forensic Findings:

• The “aged account” was actually from a 2018 GitHub data breach; credentials were recycled.
• The “proof screenshots” were cropped versions of real developer profiles.
• The seller operated under three aliases across multiple Telegram channels.

Lesson Learned: If you didn’t create or verify the account yourself, you’ll lose control the moment GitHub’s algorithms detect suspicious login behavior. Buying stolen credentials is not just risky — it may expose your IP address and data to legal scrutiny.

4. Case Study #2 — The Fake Escrow Partnership

Background: A U.K.-based freelancer wanted to purchase a GitHub account for managing client repositories anonymously. The seller on a marketplace site insisted on using a “secure escrow” service called EscrowDev.io.

The Deal:

• Price: $120
• Escrow site accepted crypto and had professional branding
• The seller claimed “money is safe until delivery”

What Happened: After transferring crypto, the buyer received a confirmation email and “escrow tracking ID.” A day later, both the marketplace and escrow site vanished. The domain was deleted, and the Telegram group was purged.

Investigation Results: Cyber-security researchers later discovered that EscrowDev.io was a fake website hosted on a shared server with five other scam projects. The same scammer controlled both “seller” and “escrow” identities.

Lesson Learned: Whenever a seller insists on using an exclusive escrow service, check its company registration, age of the domain, and business license. Legitimate escrow firms (like Escrow.com) have verified SSL, established corporate details, and rarely operate in crypto-only mode.

•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜⁕

•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜⁕

⁑⁑ If you want to more information just contact now-

⁑⁑ 24 Hours Reply/Contact

⁑⁑ ➤WhatsApp: +1 (707) 338-9711

⁑⁑ ➤Telegram: @Usaallservice

⁑⁑ ➤Skype: Usaallservice

⁑⁑ ➤Email:usaallservice24@gmail.com

•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜⁕

•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜⁕

⁑⁑ https://usaallservice.com/product/buy-github-accounts/

5. Case Study #3 — The “Cloned Profile” Impersonation Scheme

Background: A freelancer on Upwork saw a listing for a “2014 senior developer GitHub account.” The profile looked real — full of code, followers, and commits.

The Trick: The scammer cloned an existing GitHub profile by copying all public repositories, descriptions, and even commit messages. They created a near-identical username (alex-dev01 instead of alexdev) and took screenshots to prove “ownership.”

What Happened: After the buyer received login details, they realized the account had only two days of actual history. All commits had timestamps within 24 hours — a clear giveaway of falsification.

Lesson Learned: A real GitHub account shows a natural timeline of contribution activity: gaps, varied commit messages, and authentic follower engagement. If all commits happen in a short burst, it’s artificially generated.

To verify authenticity, use the GitHub API:

1https://api.github.com/users/<username>
2

1https://api.github.com/users/<username>
2

Check the created_at field — it reveals the true join date.

6. Case Study #4 — The “Team Sale” Myth

Background: A European AI startup wanted to acquire an “open-source team” with an active GitHub organization (5K stars). The seller offered full ownership of the organization for $1,000, claiming to include all repositories and contributors.

The Trap: The seller wasn’t the owner — just a member with limited permissions. They shared “access links” and dummy screenshots of ownership dashboards.

Outcome: When the buyer attempted to transfer ownership, GitHub support rejected the request. The true owner reported unauthorized access. The startup lost the funds, and GitHub banned their IP range for suspicious activity.

Lesson Learned: Only the organization owner can transfer GitHub org ownership. Always confirm through GitHub’s “Transfer Ownership” interface — never via credentials or third-party links. Even in legitimate mergers or acquisitions, GitHub requires signed documentation.

7. Case Study #5 — The “Verification by Phone” Lie

Background: A supposed U.S. vendor advertised “GitHub accounts verified with real U.S. phone numbers.” They claimed each account passed “two-factor SMS verification.”

Reality Check: GitHub does not use phone verification for account creation. It uses email and two-factor authentication via apps or keys, not SMS.

The scammer simply added a disposable email domain (maildrop.cc) and claimed it was “verified.” Many buyers fell for it because of the “100% U.S. verified” tagline.

Lesson Learned: If a listing mentions “phone verification” or “SMS-based GitHub verification,” it’s automatically fake. Always cross-reference the official GitHub Help pages before believing such claims.

8. Case Study #6 — The Multi-Account Automation Farm

Background: A marketing agency in Southeast Asia bought “100 fresh GitHub accounts” to host automated content and bots. They paid $500 via a Telegram vendor who promised “USA IP verified” accounts.

What Happened: All 100 accounts were created from the same IP cluster. Within days, GitHub’s anti-abuse system detected suspicious automation patterns and suspended every account. The buyer’s own corporate network was also flagged.

Lesson Learned: GitHub uses sophisticated behavioral detection (login timing, API usage, identical commit patterns). Buying bulk “verified” accounts for automation is a guaranteed path to suspension. Even if they work briefly, they’ll be shut down the moment patterns emerge.

9. The Shared Red Flags Behind Every Case

After analyzing dozens of such scams, five major red flags appear repeatedly:

If a listing triggers two or more of these, it’s almost certainly fraudulent.

10. Technical Methods to Verify Authentic GitHub Accounts

If you’re legitimately vetting a collaborator or organization acquisition (not buying illicit accounts), you can use these safe due-diligence techniques:

•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜⁕

•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜⁕

⁑⁑ If you want to more information just contact now-

⁑⁑ 24 Hours Reply/Contact

⁑⁑ ➤WhatsApp: +1 (707) 338-9711

⁑⁑ ➤Telegram: @Usaallservice

⁑⁑ ➤Skype: Usaallservice

⁑⁑ ➤Email:usaallservice24@gmail.com

•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜⁕

•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜•—•⁕⚜⁕

⁑⁑ https://usaallservice.com/product/buy-github-accounts/

10.1 Use the GitHub API

1curl https://api.github.com/users/<username>
2

1curl https://api.github.com/users/<username>
2

You’ll see:

• created_at: real creation date
• public_repos, followers, following: activity indicators

Discrepancies between claims and data = fake listing.

10.2 Check commit graph consistency

Legitimate developers have diverse commit activity across time. Use the contribution graph — consistent green bars over months indicate real activity, not copy-paste commits.

10.3 Analyze repository authenticity

• Look for unique README content, not forks.
• Check issues and pull requests — do they show organic interactions?
• Use gharchive.org to verify past activity logs.

10.4 Signed commits

Ask the account owner to create a signed GPG commit on any repo. Only true owners can sign with their verified key. This is impossible for impostors.