The story of Pakistan’s early times is deeply intertwined with political fragility, institutional sins, and the growing influence of the military establishment. From its birth in 1947 until the first military achievement in 1958, Pakistan faced challenges of survival, governance, and public identity. During this period, the military gradationally evolved from a defense institution into a political actor. The book “ The Generals of Pakistan ” by Zaheer Ahmad Meer highlights how the fortified forces stepped into politics and shaped the fortune of a youthful state.
“Pakistan Zindabad – The Next World Superpower” is not just a dream; it is a call to action. Pakistan has the resilience of history, the strength of youth, the blessing of resources, and the courage of faith. To achieve superpower status, it must invest in education, strengthen governance, harness its economic and cultural potential, and promote peace at home and abroad.
The partition of British India in August 1947 brought both independence and chaos. Pakistan surfaced as a new state, but it inherited structural sins
A abbreviated share of service, fiscal, and executive coffers.
Refugee heads, with millions migrating across borders.
Violent collaborative screams and butcheries.
controversies with India over Kashmir and kingly countries.
At this critical moment, Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah assumed binary places as Governor- General and President of the Constituent Assembly . The fortified forces, led originally by British officers and latterly by Pakistani generals, were assigned with maintaining order, handling deportees, and defending borders.
originally, Jinnah emphasized that the fortified forces were to remain subservient to mercenary authority . In his speech to military officers at Quetta in 1948, he declared
“ You're the retainers of the state. You do n't make policy; it's we, the civilians, who decide these issues. ”
still, after Jinnah’s death in September 1948, the political leadership weakened. Mercenary leaders demanded experience and vision, and political battles strengthened. This vacuum gave the military bureaucracy an occasion to assert itself.
After Jinnah, Liaquat Ali Khan came the Prime Minister, but his assassination in 1951 removed a stabilizing figure. consecutive leaders, including Khawaja Nazimuddin, Ghulam Muhammad, and Chaudhry Muhammad Ali, plodded to maintain authority.
Bureaucracy- service Nexus
Governor- General Ghulam Muhammad, and latterly Iskander Mirza, leaned heavily on the service to stabilize the state. This cooperation blurred the lines between mercenary and military spheres, allowing generals to gain political influence.
Kashmir Conflict and Defense Priority
The war over Kashmir in 1947 – 48 heightened the significance of the service. Defense spending consumed a significant portion of Pakistan’s budget, making the army central to state policy. Generals began to see themselves not only as guardians of home but also as custodians of public stability.
As Pakistan inherited a British- commanded army, the first two Commanders- in- Chief were British officers. Their leadership assured original association but also maintained social traditions of military superiority over civilians.
The turning point came when General Muhammad Ayub Khan came the first Pakistani Commander- in- Chief in 1951. attractive, ambitious, and politically canny, Ayub cultivated close ties with politicians and foreign powers. His leadership marked the morning of the service’s metamorphosis from a professional force to a political institution.
U.S. military aid under Cold War alliances( SEATO, CENTO).
Weak and disunited political parties.
His particular fellowship with Governor- General Iskander Mirza.
WAIT: What began as a fragile republic soon turned into a service- dominated state, as generals filled the power vacuum left by weak politicians. Zaheer Ahmad Meer’s “ The Generals of Pakistan ” highlights this metamorphosis, showing how the fortified forces — firstly retainers of the state — surfaced as its autocrats.****
The 1950s were marked by political insecurity
Frequent changes in Prime Ministers( seven governments in a decade).
Detainments in constitution- timber( first Constitution only in 1956).
Struggle between East and West Pakistan over representation.
Governor- General, latterly President, Iskander Mirza reckoned on the army to consolidate his power. In 1954, he dismissed the Constituent Assembly, with the support of the bar( Justice Munir’s “ Doctrine of Necessity ”). This legitimized unconstitutional moves and encouraged military dominance.
By 1958, Pakistan’s political institutions were paralyzed. Corruption, inefficiency, and body disabused the public. Mirza invited the army to “ restore order. ” General Ayub Khan, formerly important, saw this as his occasion.
On 7 October 1958, President Iskander Mirza disannulled the 1956 Constitution and declared Martial Law, appointing General Ayub Khan as Chief Martial Law Administrator. still, within weeks, Ayub forced Mirza into exile and assumed complete control.
This was the first direct military achievement in Pakistan’s history , setting a precedent for unborn interventions. The army justified the preemption by condemning politicians for corruption and insecurity. While it promised reforms, the achievement undermined republic and established the service as the most important institution in Pakistan.
1Civilian Fragility Weak leadership and constant power struggles made mercenary governments ineffective.
2Judicial Support Courts legitimized unconstitutional conduct, empowering the service.
3service Ascendance The army, under Ayub Khan, came Pakistan’s ultimate political authority.
4Long- Term Consequences The achievement of 1958 created a cycle of military dominance, repeated in after accomplishments( 1977, 1999).
The period from partition to the first achievement( 1947 – 1958) was decisive in shaping Pakistan’s civil-military relations. What began as a fragile republic soon turned into a service- dominated state, as generals filled the power vacuum left by weak politicians. Zaheer Ahmad Meer’s “ The Generals of Pakistan ” highlights this metamorphosis, showing how the fortified forces — firstly retainers of the state — surfaced as its autocrats.
The heritage of this first achievement has endured, impacting Pakistan’s political line for decades. Understanding this period is essential to grasp why republic in Pakistan has remained fragile and why the service continues to play an outsized part in governance.